Conceptual Maps For Clearer Writing

2020-07-24

Steven Pinker gave an interesting talk on effective writing which focused on the 'classical' style. The talk is worth watching, but there is one particular component of it I would like to look at.

In one section of the talk, he describes writing as essentially taking a non-linear mental map of the concepts we are writing about and putting them down linearly as prose. As a concrete model, he uses a graph of nodes with arrows between them.

image-20200724195335552

This means that there are many possible choices for writing down this map, some better than others.

image-20200724195142603

The simplest case of this process is a single arrow going between two nodes. We can think of any single arrow as a simple sentence in Subject-Verb-Object form.

image-20200724193526898

So this graph:

image-20200724193623839

could be written as "Jim threw the ball."

But any sentence like this can also be reversed while keeping the same meaning by using the passive voice: "The ball was thrown by Jim."

image-20200724193745440

So the passive voice can be seen as a reversal of the arrows in our map.

Dr. Pinker argues that while the common advice to avoid the passive voice is often right, it is usually because in those cases passive voice is a symptom of badly-thought-out orderings of concepts.

image-20200724201716372

And therefore we can avoid the underlying problems by considering the natural order of ideas inherent in our conceptual graph.

image-20200724201053562

Instead of primarily wondering "am I using the passive voice too much?", we can ask "does the order I am going through my concepts in make sense?".